1. notes

    6 months ago

    If you’ve got the photography skills, get off Tumblr and do something.

thedailywhat:

This Is All Kinds Of Wrong of the Day: That something as simple as a good photograph can increase the likelihood of an abandoned dog being adopted is well documented.
Emily Tanen had witnessed the effects of a professional photoshoot on an unwanted dog’s chances first hand during her time at the Manhattan branch of Animal Care and Control of New York City, when she took it upon herself to upgrade the shelter operator’s disposable camera to her own $1,500 Nikon, only to see the number of rescued dogs increase.
Hired as a liaison between ACCNYC and the groups that rescue shelter animals, Tanen says she was eventually fired for going out of her way to take better photos of pit bulls in a last-ditch effort to save them from being euthanized.
Tanen was told that she had violated the policy that prohibits photographing the dogs interacting with humans.
“I think they just didn’t want photos of animals that they were about to kill looking cute and adoptable and happy with people,” she says, “but they said it was because their research showed that photos with people didn’t encourage people to adopt.”
Sadly, for many of the dogs in ACCNYC’s care, Tanen was the last line of defense. Rescue groups would often be persuaded by her photos to take animals they would otherwise have passed on.
“I still remember Domino’s photo — the first pit bull we pulled from Manhattan,” Dog Habitat Rescue founder Jay Lombard said. “He was within 12 hours of being destroyed when Emily snapped a photo of him and attached it to an e-mail. That image hit me hard and I couldn’t turn away.”
Above: Compare Tanen’s handiwork with the ACCNYC’s sorry excuse for a snapshot.
[nyt / gizmodo.]

    If you’ve got the photography skills, get off Tumblr and do something.

    thedailywhat:

    This Is All Kinds Of Wrong of the Day: That something as simple as a good photograph can increase the likelihood of an abandoned dog being adopted is well documented.

    Emily Tanen had witnessed the effects of a professional photoshoot on an unwanted dog’s chances first hand during her time at the Manhattan branch of Animal Care and Control of New York City, when she took it upon herself to upgrade the shelter operator’s disposable camera to her own $1,500 Nikon, only to see the number of rescued dogs increase.

    Hired as a liaison between ACCNYC and the groups that rescue shelter animals, Tanen says she was eventually fired for going out of her way to take better photos of pit bulls in a last-ditch effort to save them from being euthanized.

    Tanen was told that she had violated the policy that prohibits photographing the dogs interacting with humans.

    “I think they just didn’t want photos of animals that they were about to kill looking cute and adoptable and happy with people,” she says, “but they said it was because their research showed that photos with people didn’t encourage people to adopt.”

    Sadly, for many of the dogs in ACCNYC’s care, Tanen was the last line of defense. Rescue groups would often be persuaded by her photos to take animals they would otherwise have passed on.

    “I still remember Domino’s photo — the first pit bull we pulled from Manhattan,” Dog Habitat Rescue founder Jay Lombard said. “He was within 12 hours of being destroyed when Emily snapped a photo of him and attached it to an e-mail. That image hit me hard and I couldn’t turn away.”

    Above: Compare Tanen’s handiwork with the ACCNYC’s sorry excuse for a snapshot.

    [nyt / gizmodo.]

    1. oceanicisland reblogged this from motherchief
    2. esasidra reblogged this from thedailywhat
    3. everythingiscolour reblogged this from brain-squish
    4. lifecametoahalt reblogged this from snoggered
    5. nataliejosephine reblogged this from thedailywhat
    6. acanuck-eh reblogged this from thedailywhat
    7. absinthiumlacunae reblogged this from ladyatheist
    8. sunnyskiesandbluetides reblogged this from thedarkdefender13
    9. thedarkdefender13 reblogged this from highlydosed
    10. highlydosed reblogged this from hopefulveterinarian
    11. code-sumeragi reblogged this from sammywhatammy
    12. lovesolucky reblogged this from thedailywhat
    13. morethanyouwannaknow reblogged this from brilliantbitterblue
    14. goodmorningmaxine reblogged this from thedailywhat
    15. chr-st-neee reblogged this from thedailywhat and added:
      “ALL KINDS OF WRONG”. Stupid bitches.
    16. maiden-bones reblogged this from blessedwildapplegirl
    17. ceciliacarmonapinto reblogged this from karlaaaxc
    18. karlaaaxc reblogged this from thedailywhat
    19. sinspired-in-heaven reblogged this from thedailywhat
    20. flighttakestime reblogged this from sw0rdswllngwh0r and added:
      I understand not wanting to see “your dog” interacting with another person intimately (it makes the subject of the photo...
    21. jeffersonaraujo reblogged this from thedailywhat
    22. jaymcdaniel reblogged this from blessedwildapplegirl
    23. remadi reblogged this from kioko110
    24. deniselle reblogged this from misohead
    25. ilaeria reblogged this from sleepydumpling
    26. cheeseeater reblogged this from thedailywhat
    27. superpottamus reblogged this from kaelahbee
    28. beckyspldng reblogged this from jaredwinkel
    29. adeuxvitesses reblogged this from galaxypanda
    30. xinda reblogged this from starbeasts
    31. sw0rdswllngwh0r reblogged this from toriamae
    32. keikishei reblogged this from thedailywhat and added:
      top picture killed?...out? Humans are disgusting.